From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA08410; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:20:49 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA08501 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:20:48 +0100 (MET) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f1FCKl129691; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:20:47 +0100 (MET) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.90.63]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00743; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:19:36 +0100 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14TNNR-0007Sy-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:19:13 +0100 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 13:19:13 +0100 To: Bruno.Verlyck@inria.fr Cc: georges.mariano@inrets.fr, caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: lecture assidue de la liste Message-ID: <20010215131913.B28656@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> References: <200102131052.LAA28261@pauillac.inria.fr> <3A892E4A.3646AD28@inrets.fr> <200102131623.f1DGN0s09866@mohican.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i In-Reply-To: <200102131623.f1DGN0s09866@mohican.inria.fr>; from Bruno.Verlyck@inria.fr on Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:23:00PM +0100 From: Sven LUTHER Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 05:23:00PM +0100, Bruno.Verlyck@inria.fr wrote: > I wouldn't want the English-only readers of the list to be unaware of > what is happening, so I won't reply in French. > > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:53:30 +0100 > From: Georges Mariano > > Pensez-vous vraiment que «l'axiome» selon lequel, ne plus modérer la liste > (simplement pour obtenir un flux «continu») est inévitablement équivalent à > ouvrir les portes à tous les excès, soit un point de départ satisfaisant pour > une communauté. > > En conclusion: À partir de quand est-on «amateur éclairé» ?? > > PS: J'allais dire «combien d'euros ??», mais là, c'est (très) méchant... > > Congratulations. You win. Your very convincing (though not that > sound) arguments have made the moderator resign and the caml-list > become unmoderated (hence the new signature). We are now at least 600 > people who will have to filter the messages each one for himself. Or > unsubscribe. > > Finding the appropriate words to thank you for this extremely > productive move is beyond my knowledge of English. Please wait for a month or two, and then see how many messages you have received that you would not have received before. My guess is that they will not be that much, and typing the delete message key is not that much work also. Anyway, the list has not gone fully unmoderated, but only unmoderated for subscribed members, outside posts are still filtered. Also notice that maybe Pierre has other things to do than pass, maybe 1 or 2 hours daily ?, reading mails and filtering them ? Friendly, Svne Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr