From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA25987; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:22:06 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA26171 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:22:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from mail.mangoosta.net ([217.11.161.6]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f276M4107241 for ; Wed, 7 Mar 2001 07:22:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from adsl163-200.mangoosta.net ([217.11.163.200] helo=alan-schm1p) by mail.mangoosta.net id 14aXKg-0003GH-00; Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:21:58 -0600 Received: by alan-schm1p (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 7 Mar 2001 06:20:28 +0100 From: Alan Schmitt Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 06:20:28 +0100 To: Olivier Andrieu Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Comparison of functional values Message-ID: <20010307062028.O7121@alan-schm1p.inria.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Olivier Andrieu , caml-list@inria.fr References: <15013.23546.425793.7568@akasha.ijm.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <15013.23546.425793.7568@akasha.ijm.jussieu.fr>; from andrieu@oxygene.ijm.jussieu.fr on Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:51:54PM +0100 Organization: INRIA Rocquencourt Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >Is there a way around this ? I thought I could use physical equality >(wich is OK wrt functional values) but there's no such thing as >`physical inequality'. > As stated in http://caml.inria.fr/ocaml/htmlman/manual031.html, != is the negation of ==. Alan Schmitt -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr