From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA25248; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:23:10 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA25304 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:23:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f33EN9f14176 for ; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:23:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA18419 for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:23:09 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:23:09 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling Message-ID: <20010403162309.J9381@verdot.inria.fr> References: <20010403105212.A15700@pauillac.inria.fr> <20010403154300.A808@ZhengHe.augustin.thierry> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: <20010403154300.A808@ZhengHe.augustin.thierry>; from fare@tunes.org on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:43:00PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hello, On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 03:43:00PM +0200, Francois-Rene Rideau wrote: > Couldn't camlp4 be put to good use to automatically extract > an unlabelled standard library out of the labelled one? It could, but my opinion is that duplicating code is a bad thing, even it can be done automatically. If the point is to duplicate things, let's keep as it is, with two modes: classic and label. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr