From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA00794; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:42:04 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA00768 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:41:59 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f369eI526987 for ; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:40:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.90.63]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA29730; Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:39:00 +0200 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14lSj8-0005lH-00; Fri, 06 Apr 2001 11:40:22 +0200 Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:40:22 +0200 To: Gerd Stolpmann Cc: Chris Hecker , Martin Berger , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml, java, rmi and jini Message-ID: <20010406114022.B22133@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> References: <15049.51482.197252.672850@pc803> <4.3.2.7.2.20010403121826.03425d50@shell16.ba.best.com> <01040323051504.00489@ice> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <01040323051504.00489@ice>; from gerd@gerd-stolpmann.de on Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:50:49PM +0200 From: Sven LUTHER Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 10:50:49PM +0200, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > Of course, it is still possible to use the current JavaCaml implementation, and > to extend it. However, I must warn you. "Some graphics, mouse/keyboard, > simple UI, networking" would require more performance than this emulation can > give you, even with execellent JIT compilers and fast CPUs. It's only several > thousand bytecode instructions per second. Also javacaml don't work with the current ocaml, am i right in thinking this Gerd ? I suppose not too much work would be needed to solve this, as you only need to add the primitives that were added to the standard lib between ocaml 2.0x and 3.01. What are the other java alternatives for doing interactive web sites out of ocaml bytecode, beside the cgi way that is. Also, still no luck to ever see the ocaml plugin to netscape ? Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr