caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.OZ.AU>
To: Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2001 01:06:53 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010410010653.A19738@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010409182142V.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>

On 09-Apr-2001, Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> wrote:
> From: John Max Skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
> >
> > 	The next step is to eliminate the duality in the libraries.
> > This will probably require some cleanups in the core language,
> > as well as some willingness for users to migrate.
> 
> Well, after listening to reactions, I think this next step first means
> reducing the number of duplicated labelized libraries, by admitting
> that we don't need labels in all libraries: Objective Label tried to
> offer a unified view with labels everywhere, but this is not practical
> with OCaml.  In particular, traditional OCaml users are not willing to
> migrate.

I think it would be nicer to keep the labels in the standard library,
but allow the omission of explicit labels in calls (at least in cases
where this is unambiguous), as in the current "classic" mode.
Then those who wish to can use labels, and those who don't wish to
don't have to.

You could also have a "style-checking" compiler option to require labels
in calls if the function is defined with labels.  But unlike the current
"-labels" option, this option should just restrict you to a subset of
the language; it should not permit any programs that are not permitted
with the default options.

> Then, further integration will only happen by natural adaptation:
> the standard library will stay without labels, but outside of that
> people choose the library whose design they like, be it with or
> without labels.  This is no longer a problem of being in one or the
> other community.

One problem with this approach is that it leads to mixing of different
styles, since any given piece of code may contain calls to several
different libraries, and with your proposed approach the style used
in the caller is determined by how the callee is written.


[Note: I haven't actually written any non-trivial OCaml programs.
This is just my opinion based on experience with other languages.]

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
                                    |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr.  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


  reply	other threads:[~2001-04-09 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-31  3:40 [Caml-list] Future of labels Yaron M. Minsky
2001-04-02  3:39 ` [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-02  7:58   ` Judicael Courant
2001-04-02  8:50     ` Markus Mottl
2001-04-02 10:33     ` kahl
2001-04-03  0:35       ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-03  1:36         ` Kipton M Barros
2001-04-03  1:52         ` Patrick M Doane
2001-04-03  3:53           ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-03  5:10             ` Patrick M Doane
2001-04-03  9:30               ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-03  8:52             ` Xavier Leroy
2001-04-03  9:34               ` Judicael Courant
2001-04-03  9:54               ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-03 12:59                 ` Jean-Christophe Filliatre
2001-04-03 13:11                   ` [Caml-list] ocaml, java, rmi and jini Martin Berger
2001-04-03 19:23                     ` Chris Hecker
2001-04-03 20:50                       ` Gerd Stolpmann
2001-04-06  9:40                         ` Sven LUTHER
2001-04-06 20:57                           ` Gerd Stolpmann
2001-04-03 21:06                       ` martinb
2001-04-06 15:03                     ` Xavier Leroy
2001-04-03 14:06                   ` [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-03 14:12                     ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-04-03 14:42                       ` Claude Marche
2001-04-04 19:18                     ` Gerd Stolpmann
2001-04-03  9:55               ` Ohad Rodeh
2001-04-03 18:06                 ` [Caml-list] Example of Ocaml-syntax problem with ; Mattias Waldau
2001-04-04 15:15                 ` [Caml-list] Suspending threads Ohad Rodeh
2001-04-04 17:28                   ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2001-04-06 13:21                   ` Xavier Leroy
2001-04-03 12:02               ` [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling Dave Mason
2001-04-03 13:43               ` Francois-Rene Rideau
2001-04-03 14:23                 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-04-03 13:43               ` Frank Atanassow
2001-04-03 13:58               ` Joshua D. Guttman
2001-04-03 16:52               ` Eric C. Cooper
2001-04-09  9:05                 ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-09  7:29             ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-03  8:07         ` Judicael Courant
2001-04-03  6:55     ` Chris Hecker
2001-04-03 18:13       ` [Caml-list] Generics? Brian Rogoff
2001-04-03 20:12         ` Chris Hecker
2001-04-10 16:48           ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-09  8:11       ` [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling John Max Skaller
2001-04-09  9:21         ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-09 15:06           ` Fergus Henderson [this message]
2001-04-10 18:49           ` John Max Skaller
2001-04-09 19:54         ` Chris Hecker
2001-04-10  3:37           ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-10  7:42             ` Judicael Courant
2001-04-10  8:25               ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-10  8:46               ` Claude Marche
2001-04-10 10:09                 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-10 14:42                   ` Lionnel Maugis
2001-04-10  9:06             ` François-René Rideau
2001-04-11 15:34               ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-11 17:48                 ` Dave Mason
2001-04-12 12:39                 ` [Caml-list] How do I define prog1? Mattias Waldau
2001-04-12 14:22                   ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2001-04-12 17:53                     ` William Chesters
2001-04-12 15:15                   ` Sven LUTHER
2001-04-12 16:14                     ` Mattias Waldau
2001-04-12 15:21                   ` Maxence Guesdon
2001-04-12 15:47                   ` Stefan Monnier
2001-04-17 20:04                     ` Chris Hecker
2001-04-10 22:43             ` [Caml-list] Future of labels, and ideas for library labelling Brian Rogoff
2001-04-11  8:29               ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-11  9:44                 ` Anton Moscal
2001-04-11 13:16                 ` Didier Remy
2001-04-11 15:11                   ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-04-03  7:27 Arturo Borquez
2001-04-03 16:39 John R Harrison
2001-04-04 16:37 Dave Berry
2001-04-11 10:48 Francois-Rene Rideau
2001-04-17 11:53 Poigné

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010410010653.A19738@hg.cs.mu.oz.au \
    --to=fjh@cs.mu.oz.au \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).