From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA02506; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:14:54 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA02502 for ; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:14:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.6.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4ABEpn18705; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:14:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lambda.u-strasbg.fr (mail@lambda.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.90.63]) by dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15320; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:15:11 +0200 Received: from luther by lambda.u-strasbg.fr with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 14xoR4-0005R0-00; Thu, 10 May 2001 13:16:46 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 13:16:46 +0200 To: Fabrice Le Fessant Cc: John Max Skaller , Markus Mottl , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] CDK binary release Message-ID: <20010510131646.A20887@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> References: <15094.25994.675673.222337@cremant.inria.fr> <20010509125858.B28402@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <3AF9852A.F2B18679@ozemail.com.au> <20010510004003.A27333@miss.wu-wien.ac.at> <3AF9D067.93E6DE1A@ozemail.com.au> <15098.23852.403551.65183@cremant.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <15098.23852.403551.65183@cremant.inria.fr>; from fabrice.le_fessant@inria.fr on Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:40AM +0200 From: Sven LUTHER Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Fabrice Le Fessant wrote: > > The CDK documentation tool has still many problems, but it is > currently the only tool which produces man pages for Ocaml modules and > functions. Moreover, LaTeX is not used by all Ocaml users (some are > using Windows and its wonderful editors). For now, I think the best > language is a specific language, for example, a subset of HTML. What about sgml, most project use that, and they can then transform it in many different format afterward. Also if windows people don't use latex (there is a tex suite for windows available anyway), you just need to transform the latex files into something they can use, like html, with one of the latex2html tools available (hevea for example). Releasing html documentation only is not a nice thing. Friendly, Sven Luther ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr