From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA25231; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:19:51 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA25273 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Wed, 30 May 2001 13:19:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA16749 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 21:31:04 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from wally.eecs.harvard.edu (wally.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.30]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4TJV3D00686 for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 21:31:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from labrador.eecs.harvard.edu (labrador.eecs.harvard.edu [140.247.60.247]) by wally.eecs.harvard.edu (8.10.0/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f4TJUiL05545; Tue, 29 May 2001 15:30:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200105291930.f4TJUiL05545@wally.eecs.harvard.edu> To: STARYNKEVITCH Basile cc: caml-list@inria.fr, Fermin Reig Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Ocaml and C-- In-Reply-To: Message from STARYNKEVITCH Basile of "Tue, 29 May 2001 13:25:25 +0200." <15123.34597.907480.784076@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:30:52 -0400 From: Norman Ramsey Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > Supposing that QC-- will deliver it promises... > will Ocaml switch to target C-- or will Ocaml continue to > natively target the usual architectures (x86, Alpha, Sparc, ia64, > x86-64...)? It's way too early to ask anyone to make this decision, because C-- is a long way away from being good enough and reliable enough to support a production compiler. Having said that, Fermin Reig has been doing some very interesting experiments with OCaml and C--, which I hope he will comment on here. Norman ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr