From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id GAA23340; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:10:27 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA23538 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:10:26 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from web11906.mail.yahoo.com (web11906.mail.yahoo.com [216.136.172.190]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f514AP102815 for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2001 06:10:25 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <20010601041024.31292.qmail@web11906.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.221.171.193] by web11906.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 31 May 2001 21:10:24 PDT Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 21:10:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom _ Subject: Re: [Caml-list] report describing optimization of numerical computing of the ocaml compiler. To: Brian Rogoff , Peter Ronnquist Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > Seriously, I remember reading that the implementors > are looking a lot more > at making OCaml a better vehicle for scientific > computing, so I suppose we > can expect more in the future. I've been looking a > little bit at SAC I'd recommend also taking a look at SISAL (http://www.llnl.gov/sisal/). I think both SAC and SISAL are important not only because they are functional languages, but also because they define a syntax that is quite natural for numerical applications without sacrificing their functional foundations. Tom. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr