caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miles Egan <miles@caddr.com>
To: Chris Hecker <checker@d6.com>
Cc: Jonathan Coupe <jonathan@meanwhile.freeserve.co.uk>,
	leary@nwlink.com, caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:31:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010608133117.A28472@caddr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20010608131019.03c8c840@shell16.ba.best.com>; from checker@d6.com on Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:22:44PM -0700

On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 01:22:44PM -0700, Chris Hecker wrote:
> 
> Do people actually see the current "market penetration" of ocaml as a problem?
> One big problem would be if INRIA didn't think it was popular enough to
> continue funding it, but anything short of that is not disasterous.  We might
> get more libraries and whatnot with more people, but there would be downsides
> to more popularity as well.

I certainly don't think Ocaml's popularity or lack thereof is a problem and I
agree there advantages in letting it grow at its own pace.  I'm mainly
interested in increasing its market penetration where I work so I can stop
writing Python code.

-- 
miles
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


  reply	other threads:[~2001-06-08 20:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-07  8:58 leary
2001-06-07 18:29 ` Jonathan Coupe
2001-06-08  9:41   ` leary
2001-06-08 10:05     ` Why is Ocaml better than Java (WAS: [Caml-list] ocaml complexity) Mattias Waldau
2001-06-08 13:31       ` Pierre Weis
2001-06-08 16:37         ` William Chesters
2001-06-08 21:39       ` Brian Rogoff
     [not found]       ` <Pine.BSF.4.21.0106081430070.27414-100000@shell5.ba.best.co m>
2001-06-08 22:16         ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-08 12:27     ` [Caml-list] ocaml complexity Jonathan Coupe
2001-06-08 20:22       ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-08 20:31         ` Miles Egan [this message]
2001-06-08 22:17           ` Jonathan Coupe
2001-06-08 22:18             ` Miles Egan
2001-06-11 14:05             ` Pierre Weis
2001-06-09 19:41           ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-08 22:59         ` David Fox
2001-06-09  0:43         ` leary
2001-06-09  1:09           ` Mark Wotton
2001-06-09  8:36           ` Markus Mottl
2001-06-09 20:58           ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-08 22:46       ` leary
2001-06-09  1:18         ` David Fox
2001-06-12 14:17           ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-13 15:21             ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-13 20:32               ` leary
2001-06-13 22:58                 ` Johann Höchtl
2001-06-13 21:18               ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-09 22:32         ` Jonathan Coupe
2001-06-11  0:20           ` leary
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-14 16:04 John R Harrison
2001-06-13 21:04 David Gurr
2001-06-13 23:13 ` leary
2001-06-13 23:19 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-15 13:28   ` Tore Lund
2001-06-15 14:03     ` Nils Goesche
2001-06-15 14:54       ` Xavier Leroy
2001-06-15 15:14         ` Jonathan Coupe
2001-06-15 15:23         ` Nils Goesche
2001-06-15 17:38         ` Sven LUTHER
2001-06-15 20:36           ` Remi VANICAT
2001-06-15 14:16     ` Doug Bagley
2001-06-28 12:54   ` Didier Remy
2001-06-28 18:31     ` Brian Rogoff
2001-06-11 20:33 Arturo Borquez
2001-06-11 21:17 ` Miles Egan
2001-06-12  7:19   ` wester
2001-06-06 16:50 Miles Egan
2001-06-06 17:30 ` Chris Hecker
2001-06-06 18:25 ` Charles Martin
2001-06-06 19:27   ` Michael Hicks
2001-06-06 21:15   ` David Fox
2001-06-07 12:25   ` FabienFleutot
2001-06-08  0:27   ` Miles Egan
2001-06-06 19:36 ` William Chesters
2001-06-06 19:55   ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-06 20:06     ` William Chesters
2001-06-07 16:30       ` John Max Skaller
2001-06-08  0:32   ` Miles Egan
2001-06-08  0:56     ` David Fox
2001-06-07  7:35 ` wester
2001-06-07 17:27   ` John Max Skaller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010608133117.A28472@caddr.com \
    --to=miles@caddr.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=checker@d6.com \
    --cc=jonathan@meanwhile.freeserve.co.uk \
    --cc=leary@nwlink.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).