From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA07527; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:19:10 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA07543 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 08:19:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id WAA30184 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:37:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from wn1.sci.kun.nl (wn1.sci.kun.nl [131.174.8.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5DKbTf17028 for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:37:29 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from adridg.sci.kun.nl by wn1.sci.kun.nl via dialin-18.sci.kun.nl [131.174.9.18] with ESMTP for id f5DKbQh06867 (8.11.3/3.19); Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:37:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by adridg.sci.kun.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA02662 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:37:25 +0200 Message-Id: <200106132037.WAA02662@adridg.sci.kun.nl> X-Authentication-Warning: adridg.sci.kun.nl: adridg set sender to adridg@sci.kun.nl using -f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: "Adriaan de Groot" Reply-To: adridg@sci.kun.nl To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Repeat: is there a Qt binding for OCaml? Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 22:37:25 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk It was last asked midway through 2000: is there a Qt binding for OCaml? Within the KDE community there are several developers who would really be interested in working on Qt -- and KDE -- bindings for OCaml, but there's no sense in that if they already exist. In particular, there was mention of a partially working Qt binding -- perhaps the author of that could give me a ring? What's the point, you ask, of Qt bindings (as opposed to Gtk bindings which we all know exist already)? It's probably a religious thing. But I know C++ gets me down some days, and I'd like to do something functional and OO at the same time. Besides, I think OCaml + Qt is a good choice vs. Clean + w98, but that's a whole other flamewar. -- [ade] at home, probably hacking at KPilot ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr