From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA12270; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:36:20 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA12443 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:36:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.16.1]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5E8aGX29762 for ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:36:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (suiren.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp [130.54.16.25]) by kurims.kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with ESMTP id RAA15597; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:36:11 +0900 (JST) To: leary@nwlink.com Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline In-Reply-To: <20010614005154.A28131@jean> References: <200106132037.WAA02662@adridg.sci.kun.nl> <20010614155744J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20010614005154.A28131@jean> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20010614173611H.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 17:36:11 +0900 From: Jacques Garrigue X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk It looks like you've got the wrong subject line. >>From the context, you seem to be talking about GNU readline. From: leary@nwlink.com Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Repeat: is there a Qt binding for OCaml? > Any chance of changing to or adding GPL? To what? To the caml toplevel? And the bytecode compiler since it is included? I'm in no position to answer, but if the goal is only to use GNU readline, then I do not really see the point. There are many alternatives avilable. Only very few libraries are distributed under the GPL, and most of them you would not want to include by default in the ocaml toplevel. (It might be OK to link with them as long as you do not distribute the result, but I'm no expert in GPL.) > Anyone written/writing a wrapper? I don't know of any. Again, GNU readline, while being a useful tool, is not unique, and making ledit into a library might be more interesting. Best regards, Jacques Garrigue ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr