From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id HAA00655; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:05:10 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id HAA31585 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:05:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from ip208.usw4.rb1.pdx.nwlink.com (ip208.usw4.rb1.pdx.nwlink.com [209.20.133.208]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f5F557505435 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 07:05:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 4759 invoked by uid 500); 15 Jun 2001 05:05:06 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 22:05:06 -0700 From: leary@nwlink.com To: Pierre Weis Cc: caml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline Message-ID: <20010614220506.A4691@jean> References: <3B2913F0.C1EFFD6F@ozemail.com.au> <200106142103.XAA09003@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200106142103.XAA09003@pauillac.inria.fr>; from Pierre.Weis@inria.fr on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:03:28PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 11:03:28PM +0200, Pierre Weis wrote: > help us to improve > the quality of ledit nad more generally of our Caml packages. /me interjects: Ledit needs a vi mode. :) Doesn't look like it would be too hard, except for maybe the modes. Not to pick on ledit but it's not up to date with the current syntax (singular ; rather than ;;, and extra ; where none might be needed. But then, I'm hardly one to know. Anyhow, it still works fine. :o) ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr