From: Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
To: Chris Curtis <chriscurtis@satel.com>
Cc: leary@nwlink.com,
Jacques Garrigue <garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp>,
caml <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Repeat: is there a Qt binding for OCaml?
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 11:55:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010615115508.B8338@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <web-181345@hardnoc.net>
On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 09:25:06AM -0600, Chris Curtis wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Jun 2001 00:51:54 -0700
> leary@nwlink.com wrote:
> > Any chance of changing to or adding GPL?
>
> PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don't. I agree that readline would be
> cool, but in return you give up the ability to use the
> toplevel in any non-GPL environment. GPL is a very big
> hammer; let's not go swinging it hastily.
Unless you dual license like TrollTech finally did for Qt.
This said, i am not asking for a GPLed version of ocaml, please don't take it
so.
That said, i have just checked, the toplevel directory is under the QPL, i
suppose it links also to all the LGPLed part of the ocaml runtime, altough a
quick glance at the corresponding makefile don't show that clearly.
Would a LGPLed version of the toplevel files solve this, i don't know, i just
aksed the debian legal mailing list about this, will forward what they tell me
about it.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-15 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-13 20:37 Adriaan de Groot
2001-06-14 6:57 ` Jacques Garrigue
2001-06-14 7:51 ` leary
2001-06-14 8:36 ` [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline Jacques Garrigue
2001-06-14 15:25 ` [Caml-list] Repeat: is there a Qt binding for OCaml? Chris Curtis
2001-06-15 9:55 ` Sven LUTHER [this message]
2001-06-14 15:22 ` Chris Curtis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010615115508.B8338@lambda.u-strasbg.fr \
--to=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=chriscurtis@satel.com \
--cc=garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp \
--cc=leary@nwlink.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).