From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA06723; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:21:39 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA06676 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:21:38 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5FALa513283; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:21:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA18526; Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:21:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 12:21:36 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: leary@nwlink.com Cc: caml Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline Message-ID: <20010615122136.A18433@verdot.inria.fr> References: <3B2913F0.C1EFFD6F@ozemail.com.au> <200106142103.XAA09003@pauillac.inria.fr> <20010614220506.A4691@jean> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: <20010614220506.A4691@jean>; from leary@nwlink.com on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:05:06PM -0700 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:05:06PM -0700, leary@nwlink.com wrote: > Not to pick on ledit but it's not up to date with the current syntax > (singular ; rather than ;;, and extra ; where none might be needed. But > then, I'm hardly one to know. Anyhow, it still works fine. :o) It uses the "revised syntax", an alternative syntax proposed by Camlp4, and the only syntax I use. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr