From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA27791; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:52:36 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA27787 for ; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:52:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5MHqYX13731; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:52:34 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA10556; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:52:34 +0200 Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 19:52:34 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: Sven LUTHER Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Caml toplevel and readline Message-ID: <20010622195234.D9730@verdot.inria.fr> References: <3B2796C1.9144F7AE@ozemail.com.au> <20010622165648.B24296@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0us In-Reply-To: <20010622165648.B24296@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>; from luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr on Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:56:48PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:56:48PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote: > In the end the ledit option seems the more attractive, being written in ocaml > and all. I would love to have it included in the base ocaml tarball. BTW, ledit can absolutely be used as a library. You can use Ledit.input_char instead of input_char (of Pervasives), and you have a line editing. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr