From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA04996; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:02:09 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA04985 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:02:08 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from www.invert.com (www.microcomp-uptech.com [209.164.21.15]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f5PL26L06866 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 23:02:07 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from miles@localhost) by www.invert.com (8.10.1/8.10.1AA) id f5PL25462156 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:02:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from miles) Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:02:05 -0700 From: Miles Egan To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] splitting ocaml-list Message-ID: <20010625140205.A61802@caddr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Would it make sense to split up caml-list into a few new lists? A lot of other language projects offer three lists, a devel list, an announce list, and a users list. For ocaml, this would be: caml-announce: announcements of new versions of ocaml and ocaml-related packages caml-devel: discussion of ocaml bugs and internals caml-users: general questions about ocaml usage and problems Such a division might make it easier for people to ask newbie questions without troubling the core ocaml team. On the other hand, caml-list is fairly low volume, so it might not be worth it. -- miles ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr