From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA16412; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 10:32:14 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA16399 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 10:32:13 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost.localdomain (Mix-Montsouris-109-2-35.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.248.101.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f6M8WCj22411 for ; Sun, 22 Jul 2001 10:32:12 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 31806 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Jul 2001 08:18:45 -0000 Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 10:18:45 +0200 From: Berke Durak To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] Module (re)construction cost Message-ID: <20010722101845.A31393@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Does building a functorized module cost anything at all ? I have a program with a lot of high-level modules that depend on a small set of interdependent modules parametrized by one common module. Should the high-level modules get the (already-built) core modules as ``parameters'' from the main module, or should they reconstruct them by getting only the common module from their parent ? i.e. does functor application cost anything (time ? memory ?). -- Berke ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr