caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kai Kaminski" <kok@wtal.de>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Integer arithmetic: mod
Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2001 12:49:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010804124945.A354@alpha2.tabu.stw-bonn.de> (raw)

Hi,

I have a question regarding the 'mod' operator in OCaml. While playing
around with the toplevel, I found that

-1 mod 10 = -1 instead of -1 mod 10 = 9.

Looking into the Handbook showed me, that the behaviour of 'mod' is
platform dependent for negative arguments.
Now, I could live with -1 mod 10 = -1, but why is it platform-dependent?
As far as I can see it would be better to specify a certain behaviour
and emulate it on platforms, where it is not directly supported by the
cpu, especially for a high-level language as OCaml.
The reason is that whenever such a behaviour is platform-dependent, you
can't use it at all, as long as you want to have your programs portable.
Beside that the speed penalty (are there other problems with this
approach?) would probably be not too bad, would it?

On the other hand I'm just a student, who doesn't know too much about
programming languages and their implementation. So could someone please
enlighten me?

Kai Kaminski
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


             reply	other threads:[~2001-08-04 10:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-04 10:49 Kai Kaminski [this message]
2001-08-04 18:48 ` Chris Hecker
2001-08-05 23:35 ` John Max Skaller
2001-08-10 22:10   ` Kai Kaminski
2001-08-06  9:10 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-08-10 22:29   ` Kai Kaminski
2001-08-13 15:21     ` Xavier Leroy
     [not found] <9khicj$3n3$1@qrnik.zagroda>
2001-08-04 20:25 ` Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
2001-08-05  8:05   ` Chris Hecker
2001-08-06  1:06     ` John Gerard Malecki
2001-08-06 13:23 Dave Berry
2001-11-09 10:30 Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS
2001-11-19 15:49 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-11-19 16:48   ` Vesa Karvonen
2001-11-19 16:39 Krishnaswami, Neel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010804124945.A354@alpha2.tabu.stw-bonn.de \
    --to=kok@wtal.de \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).