From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA19421; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:02:48 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA19387 for ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:02:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from templestowe.rem.cmu.edu ([207.233.206.52]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f7982jH16944; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 10:02:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from aheitner by templestowe.rem.cmu.edu with local (Exim 3.22 #1 (Debian)) id 15Ukm2-0000gI-00; Thu, 09 Aug 2001 04:02:34 -0400 Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 04:02:34 -0400 From: Ari Heitner To: Florian Hars Cc: Daniel de Rauglaudre , Florian Hars , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: ledit (was: OCaml as fancy calculator...) Message-ID: <20010809040234.A2597@andrew.cmu.edu> References: <3B6FFC09.1BB84969@maxtal.com.au> <20010807171614.B1646@hars> <20010807193418.A2336@verdot.inria.fr> <20010809092141.C6270@hars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.17i In-Reply-To: <20010809092141.C6270@hars>; from florian@hars.de on Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:21:41AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 09:21:41AM +0200, Florian Hars wrote: > On Tue, Aug 07, 2001 at 07:34:18PM +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre wrote: > > You need OCaml and Camlp4 versions 3.02 to compile the latest versions > > of ledit. > > This is bad, since it means that ledit will not be usable on Debian systems > for at least the next two years. (Apart from the license problem that > prohibits its inclusion anyway). > how do you figure? [from /debian/dists/sid/main/binary-i386/Packages.gz] Package: camlp4 Version: 3.02-1 Package: ocaml Version: 3.02-1 Claiming things are broken because you are unwilling to run up-to-date versions of dependencies is pretty anti-progress, and a lousy excuse or reason for anything, imho. cheers, Ari ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr