From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id AAA06183; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:31:33 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id AAA06143 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:31:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from alpha2.tabu.stw-bonn.de (alpha2.tabu.stw-bonn.de [131.220.159.106]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with SMTP id f7AMVVj05169 for ; Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:31:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (qmail 5087 invoked by uid 1001); 10 Aug 2001 22:29:42 -0000 From: "Kai Kaminski" Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:29:42 +0200 To: Xavier Leroy , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Integer arithmetic: mod Message-ID: <20010811002942.E4854@alpha2.tabu.stw-bonn.de> References: <20010804124945.A354@alpha2.tabu.stw-bonn.de> <20010806111000.N7188@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010806111000.N7188@pauillac.inria.fr>; from Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr on Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:10:00AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 11:10:00AM +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote: > > Haskell has both: div & mod truncate downwards, quot & rem truncate > > towards 0. > So does Ada, I think. It's probably a good idea to have two sets of > operators, and document that one of them (those that truncate downwards) > is a bit less efficient. I agree. Is there a chance that this will really happen in a future release of OCaml? Is there a roadmap for OCaml-development? Kai Kaminski ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr