From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA02777; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:45:34 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA03064 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Thu, 6 Sep 2001 11:45:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA18143 for ; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:56:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from sarg.ryerson.ca (sarg.ryerson.ca [141.117.18.117]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f85Culb04872; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:56:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from sarg.ryerson.ca (dmason@localhost) by sarg.ryerson.ca (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f85Cuf105667; Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:56:41 -0400 Message-Id: <200109051256.f85Cuf105667@sarg.ryerson.ca> To: Daniel de Rauglaudre cc: caml-list@inria.fr, dmason@sarg.ryerson.ca Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Different types of streams In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Sep 2001 14:06:10 +0200." <20010905140610.V5393@verdot.inria.fr> User-Agent: EMH/1.10.0 SEMI/1.13.7 (Awazu) CLIME/1.13.6 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQ2YlTj4xGyhC?=) MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 14) (Cuyahoga Valley) (alpha-redhat-linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.13.7 - "Awazu") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2001 08:56:41 -0400 From: Dave Mason Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 14:06:10 +0200, Daniel de Rauglaudre said: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 06:58:59AM -0400, Dave Mason wrote: >> I want to re-iterate this. I have several 10's of lines of caml >> code, and probably 1/2 of the programs I write use the [< >] >> parsing. > And what is the problem? Sorry, should have said 10's of *thousands* of lines. > The point is *not* to remove streams!!!! Streams and their LL1 > parsers remain!!! I just ask people to preprocess by "-pp > camlp4o". Is that so complicated? Are you allergic to my program? Please don't get defensive, I'm not meaning to attack you! You omitted the part of my original email where I said that I honestly don't know how easy it is to use this through camlp4o. If it's trivial (i.e. just add ``-pp camlp4o''), I don't understand why it won't be the default, and if it's not trivial, I (and several other people) will be unhappy. I get the sense, from your apparent upset, that it really is that trivial. Thanks ../Dave ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr