From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA08474; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:32:15 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA08482 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:32:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f9C6Spj08587; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:28:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from fpottier@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id IAA08244; Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:28:50 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 08:28:50 +0200 From: Francois Pottier To: Maxence Guesdon Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: [Caml-announce] OCamldoc Message-ID: <20011012082850.B8252@pauillac.inria.fr> Reply-To: Francois.Pottier@inria.fr References: <15204.1002728341@saul.cis.upenn.edu> <3BC49730.28AE6FB@sbuilders.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <3BC49730.28AE6FB@sbuilders.com>; from max@sbuilders.com on Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 08:45:04PM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > A simpler way is : > if no blank line separates the comment and the element, then they're associated. > What's the need for indentation ? Ah, but some people (including me) want to insert a blank line between comment and element... (Sorry to be so picky :) -- François Pottier Francois.Pottier@inria.fr http://pauillac.inria.fr/~fpottier/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr