From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA16285; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:32:26 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA15965 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:32:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from quincy.inria.fr (quincy.inria.fr [128.93.8.52]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id f9PHWPr11375 for ; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:32:25 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from mauny@localhost) by quincy.inria.fr (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f9PHaag24656 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:36:36 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 19:36:35 +0200 From: Michel Mauny To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium? Message-ID: <20011025193635.A24588@quincy.inria.fr> Reply-To: Michel.Mauny@inria.fr References: <20011020012347.A29847@quincy.inria.fr> <20011019192854.N9735-100000@shell5.ba.best.com> <20011020172932.A5967@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> <20011022192533.A12039@quincy.inria.fr> <3BD45932.6D782E08@earthlink.net> <20011024175707.A23319@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> <20011024190544.10046550.georges.mariano@inrets.fr> <20011025081311.B26737@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011025081311.B26737@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>; from luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 08:13:11AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Dear all, Let me first inform you that another french company is currently in the "pipe" of becoming a member. I'll announce it more precisely when the papers will be signed, but I think that we can reasonably consider that we currently have 4 members in the Caml Consortium. We need more, but we are on the right way :-) About a non-profit organization such as an "Association loi 1901" as proposed by Sven: On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 07:05:44PM +0200, georges mariano wrote: > Question : > Suppose that such idea will reach the implementation stage, > how will be this Association considered by "THE" Consortium ? Sven replied (Oct 25 2001, 08:13AM +0200): > As i understood, we will be a full member I confirm that there would be absolutely no problem, and we would be very happy to have such an organization as a member. Regards, -- Michel ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr