caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michel Mauny <Michel.Mauny@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium?
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2001 20:37:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011025203738.B24282@quincy.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15319.58040.859039.299169@gargle.gargle.HOWL>; from tews@tcs.inf.tu-dresden.de on Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 12:00:24PM +0200

Hendrik Tews wrote/écrivait (Oct 25 2001, 12:00PM +0200):
> Sven writes:
>    i was contemplating creating a association in france to group
>    several users which would, once we are able to sum up the 2000
>    euros, become one member of the consortium.
> 
> Are you sure that your application to become a member of the
> consortium will be successful? As I understand it, INRIA decides
> on the applications.

I confirm that we want such an application to be successful and I see no
problem at all.

> My impression from the current thread (and from previous ones on
> the consortium) is that there is some confusion about the real
> purpose of the consortium (i.e., INRIAS position)

Well, Xavier's post (http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200110/msg00272.html)
was rather clear, as well as the description of the Consortium given
as appendix of the membership agreement at

  http://caml.inria.fr/consortium/documents/Annex1-eng.shtml

Roughly speaking, the idea is to bring together major users (as many
as possible) in order to make other potential users more confident in
the future of OCaml. The existence of the Consortium should bring
(probably partial) answers to questions such as "Who else is using
it?", "What happens in case INRIA stops supporting it?". Hopefully, at
some point, some companies able to sell services around Caml will be
members of the CC, and that could also help in answering other
important questions such as "What company could maintain, adapt or
further develop this OCaml app that we are planning to use?"

The goal of further developing OCaml for it to match more precisely
the needs of programmers, and getting funds for that, is of course
also important, but I think the primary goal is the one given above.

We all understand that it's a chicken/egg problem, and this is why
it's starting a bit slowly (my opinion). (Well, honestly, one should
probably also add some work overload on my side as an another reason.)

And, again, forming an OCaml users group that would be a member of the
Consortium is definitely a good idea.

-- Michel
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-10-25 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-10-15 20:37 Brian Rogoff
2001-10-15 20:55 ` Patrick M Doane
2001-10-19 23:23   ` Michel Mauny
2001-10-20  2:50     ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-20  3:58       ` Julian Assange
2001-10-20 15:29       ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-21  1:17         ` Brian Rogoff
2001-10-21 23:06           ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-22 15:47             ` Rolf Wester
2001-10-23 10:22               ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-23 13:41                 ` Rolf Wester
2001-10-24 13:52                   ` Mattias Waldau
2001-10-24 14:11                     ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-24 14:18                     ` Cuihtlauac ALVARADO
2001-10-25  6:05                       ` Sven
2001-10-26 14:16                       ` Dmitry Bely
2001-10-26 15:51                         ` Francois Rouaix
2001-10-26  8:45                     ` Benjamin C. Pierce
2001-10-24 13:59                   ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-25  9:54                   ` Frank Atanassow
2001-10-24 13:56                 ` Mike Leary
2001-10-22 17:25         ` Michel Mauny
2001-10-22 17:36           ` Ken Rose
2001-10-22 19:08             ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-23 10:08               ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-10-23 10:52                 ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-24 14:48             ` Xavier Leroy
2001-10-24 15:17               ` Markus Mottl
2001-10-24 17:35               ` Joshua D. Guttman
2001-10-25 18:46                 ` Michel Mauny
2001-10-24 15:57             ` Sven
2001-10-24 17:05               ` georges mariano
2001-10-25  6:13                 ` Sven
2001-10-25 17:36                   ` Michel Mauny
2001-10-25 10:00               ` Hendrik Tews
2001-10-25 15:45                 ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2001-10-30  8:52                   ` Hendrik Tews
2001-10-30  9:21                     ` Fabrice Le Fessant
2001-10-25 18:37                 ` Michel Mauny [this message]
2001-10-26  9:56                 ` Sven
2001-10-30  9:00                   ` Hendrik Tews
2001-10-26 12:13                 ` [Caml-list] user contributions to the core OCaml distribution? Xavier Leroy
2001-10-29 11:15                   ` Sven
2001-10-22 18:41           ` [Caml-list] Whither the Caml Consortium? Markus Mottl
2001-10-22 18:47       ` Xavier Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20011025203738.B24282@quincy.inria.fr \
    --to=michel.mauny@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).