From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA17488; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:37:03 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA17323 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:37:02 +0100 (MET) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id fA9Fb1511240 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 16:37:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (patrick@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.5) with ESMTP id fA9FaBM81355; Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:36:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from patrick@watson.org) Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 10:36:10 -0500 (EST) From: Patrick M Doane To: Sven cc: Michael Welsh Duggan , Caml-list Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml In-Reply-To: <20011109102705.C8267@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> Message-ID: <20011109103308.A80907-100000@fledge.watson.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, Sven wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 12:58:30AM -0500, Patrick M Doane wrote: > > It's section 6. I extracted two sections from it (that I labeled 1 and 2). > > But apparently without reading it indepth, or at least understanding what it > trully says. Making assumptions like this is really inappropriate. I have read the LGPL carefully in hopes that it would not be so restrictive. I believe there is legitimate confusion in the license as to whether object code is sufficient. Either way, including object code is still too much to ask for. Patrick ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr