From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA01757; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:53:30 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA01753 for ; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:53:29 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id fAQDrL119805; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:53:21 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id OAA01748; Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:53:20 +0100 (MET) Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:53:20 +0100 From: Xavier Leroy To: Ohad Rodeh Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] request: winsock2 error codes Message-ID: <20011126145320.B1670@pauillac.inria.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from ORODEH@il.ibm.com on Thu, Nov 22, 2001 at 08:02:21AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > I have a request regarding exception handling in the unix module > under win32. A large subset of the errors used in winsock2 is > similar to unix and winsock1, with the added twist of adding a WSA > in front of the code. The error mapping code in the win32unix library was recently revamped (to get rid of dependencies on the _dosmaperr internal function of the C library), so it should be much easier now to do a better mapping of Winsock error codes. I'll look into that. Thanks for the suggestion, - Xavier Leroy ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr