From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA20170; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:26 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA20169 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fAT8hPT07958 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:25 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id JAA04728 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:25 +0100 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:25 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml Message-ID: <20011129094325.A4695@verdot.inria.fr> References: <20011128192239.B9601@pauillac.inria.fr> <20011129093158.B11328@hars> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20011129093158.B11328@hars>; from florian@hars.de on Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:31:58AM +0100 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 09:31:58AM +0100, Florian Hars wrote: > Be careful, this requirement, at least in the way it is worded here, > is in contradiction to the definition of free as used by the FSF and > adopting a licence the implements it would make OCaml incompatible > with the GPL. The point is the LGPL, not the GPL. We don't want the GPL to contaminate users programs. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr