From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA09085; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 22:11:37 +0100 (MET) Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id WAA09109 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 22:11:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA31922 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 04:24:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from pele.santafe.edu (pele.santafe.edu [192.12.12.119]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fB13Njn28701; Sat, 1 Dec 2001 04:23:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA11519; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:23:16 -0700 (MST) Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id fB13NGb18105; Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:23:16 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 20:23:16 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200112010323.fB13NGb18105@aztec.santafe.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f From: Richard Stallman To: proff@iq.org CC: dsyme@microsoft.com, gbacon@hiwaay.net, proff@iq.org, xavier.leroy@inria.fr, jfield@us.ibm.com, caml-list@inria.fr In-reply-to: <20011130015919.97483259CA@suburbia.net> (proff@iq.org) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] License Conditions for OCaml Reply-to: rms@gnu.org References: <20011130015919.97483259CA@suburbia.net> Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk People seem to have included me in the middle of a discussion of some licensing issue. The discussion is very abstract, and I can't tell what people are arguing about. Could someone send me a brief description of the actual scenario? Who is doing what to whom? ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr