From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA29514; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:22:44 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA29519 for caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 09:22:43 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA20422 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:43:00 +0100 (MET) Received: from suburbia.net (suburbia.net [203.4.184.1]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fB2Fgv127225 for ; Sun, 2 Dec 2001 16:42:58 +0100 (MET) Received: by suburbia.net (Postfix, from userid 110) id A9402259C3; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 02:42:48 +1100 (EST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: SysThreads and DLL's In-Reply-To: <000701c17a4e$8a289e00$210148bf@dylan> To: David McClain Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 02:42:48 +1100 (EST) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL93 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20011202154248.A9402259C3@suburbia.net> From: proff@iq.org (Julian Assange) Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > My aim is code base reduction, and ease of generation, because I want to > unload about 300 KLOC onto some unsuspecting maintenance programmer. I need > to get out from under this code burden!!!! So the jury is still out on which > way to go... Code base reduction is the same, ease of use is somewhat better > in Lisp, but robustness is significantly better in OCaml... It also helps to > have the source code!! > > Cheers, But, does the unsuspecting maintenance programmer know OCaml? Cheers, Julian. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr