caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Caml-list] inlining of functions
@ 2001-12-16 15:30 Markus Mottl
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Markus Mottl @ 2001-12-16 15:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: OCAML

Hello,

I would like to know why OCaml does not produce the same machine code for:

  let f x =
    let g n = x + n in
    g 1, g 2

and:

  let f x =
    x + 1, x + 2

OCaml obviously performs some inlining, but otherwise produces more
redundant code in the first example. The reason why I ask is that it
often happens that I want to factor out computations that are shared
between different case-arms like in:

  let f x =
    let g y = ... h x y ... in
    match foo with
    | A -> g n
    | B -> g m

It may degrade performance in tight loops quite visibly if there is
extra-code to execute. One would have to use copy&paste to prevent this,
which is not really that elegant.

Regards,
Markus Mottl

P.S.:  Congratulations to the whole OCaml-team for the recent release
       of OCaml-3.04! You should add some bugs from time to time so
       that people do not get bored marvelling about its unvaryingly
       superb quality! ;)

-- 
Markus Mottl                                             markus@oefai.at
Austrian Research Institute
for Artificial Intelligence                  http://www.oefai.at/~markus
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2001-12-17 17:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-12-16 15:30 [Caml-list] inlining of functions Markus Mottl

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).