[Caml-list] one more thing

[Caml-list] one more thing

[Will Benton]

Is there some way to get ocamlyacc to include some code in the parser.mli
file it generates?  I'm having ocamlyacc generate objects whose type
constructors are defined in another module, and I have "open Module" in
the .mly file -- but, since it isn't included in the .mli file, the .mli
file won't compile.  (Or is my environment screwed-up?)

I apologize for my lack of caml-literacy.




thanks,
wb

---
Will Benton      | "Nicht wie die Welt ist, ist das Mystische, 
willb@acm.org    |  sondern daß sie ist." --L. Wittgenstein

-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr

Re: [Caml-list] one more thing

[Florian Hars]

On Fri, Dec 28, 2001 at 12:43:41AM -0600, Will Benton wrote:
> Is there some way to get ocamlyacc to include some code in the parser.mli
> file it generates?  I'm having ocamlyacc generate objects whose type
> constructors are defined in another module, and I have "open Module" in
> the .mly file -- but, since it isn't included in the .mli file, the .mli
> file won't compile.  (Or is my environment screwed-up?)

The last time  somehing like this was discussed (
http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200110/msg00209.html
) the recommended solution was to put all definitions in a separate
module and use fully qualified names in the mly, so they end up
fully qualified in the mli, so don't say "open Module", but 
"Module.some_function x". It is preferrable for reasons of 
maintainability, anyway.

Yours, Florian Hars.
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs  FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr  Archives: http://caml.inria.fr