From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA17657; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:43:02 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA17823 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:43:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g0BFh0P23164; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:43:00 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA17939; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:42:59 +0100 (MET) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:42:59 +0100 From: Xavier Leroy To: malc Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Is it really a non issue? Message-ID: <20020111164259.A17704@pauillac.inria.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from malc@pulsesoft.com on Fri, Jan 11, 2002 at 04:57:13PM -0500 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > I noticed that my bug report was silently moved to 'not a bug' > section. Yes, because I consider that it is not a bug. > Despite report's subject 'Not a bug, but...' i do think its > atleast an issue. I don't. End of discussion. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr