From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id UAA23255; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:51:14 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA21555 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:51:13 +0100 (MET) Received: from beaune.inria.fr (beaune.inria.fr [128.93.8.3]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g0BJpCP00977 for ; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:51:12 +0100 (MET) Received: by beaune.inria.fr (8.8.8/1.1.22.3/14Sep99-0328PM) id UAA0000013614; Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:51:12 +0100 (MET) From: Luc Maranget Message-Id: <200201111951.UAA0000013614@beaune.inria.fr> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Is it really a non issue? To: malc@pulsesoft.com (malc) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 20:51:12 +0100 (MET) Cc: caml-list@inria.fr In-Reply-To: from "malc" at jan 11, 2002 04:57:13 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > > > I noticed that my bug report was silently moved to 'not a bug' > section. Despite report's subject 'Not a bug, but...' i do think its > atleast an issue. Consider this: > > file a.ml: > let a = 1 > > file a.mli: > val a : int \ > val a : int | > ........... | n times > val a : int | > val a : int / > > > After compilation/linking we will get huge .cmi and binary with data > section (n-1)*4(on 32bit architectures) bytes bigger that it should have > been. Current ocamlopt.opt is 12 bytes bigger due to redundant declartions > in bytecomp/lambda.mli(is_guarded,patch_guarded) and > utils/clflags.ml(dump_scheduling), not a big deal but still anoying. This is probably an issue, but I do not think it is related to the previous post on records. At least, we should get those nasty 12 bytes back ! Thank you for your issue report (:->) --Luc PS> I guess I can understand Xavier, sometimes some people complain about so-called bugs which are in facts features, and for features such as the ``cannot use record labels as I would have wished to'' it is just too often. ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr