From: Patrick M Doane <patrick@watson.org>
To: Sven <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
Cc: Xavier Leroy <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>,
Pixel <pixel@mandrakesoft.com>, <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] -thread and ocamlc vs ocamlc.opt
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:38:06 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020116113502.P68595-100000@fledge.watson.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020116172954.A8211@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Sven wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:03:35PM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote:
> > Frankly, I would rather remove the .opt compilers from the RPM, rather
> > than remove the non-.opt compilers.
>
> Mmm, ...
>
> Is there really much people using the .opt compilers ? Does it really make
> sense to have them packaged ?
I occasionally use them for larger projects - typically noticing a
compilation speed imrovement of about 50-100%.
I've also been trying to represent a DOM like interface in Caml lately
which really benefits from using the .opt compiler. There are a large
number of cyclic class types and the typechecking can take a bit of time
so I notice substantial improvements with the .opt compilers (more in the
range of 5x or so as a guess).
Patrick
-------------------
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-16 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-13 21:39 Pixel
2002-01-16 16:03 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-01-16 16:29 ` Sven
2002-01-16 16:38 ` Patrick M Doane [this message]
2002-01-16 16:43 ` Xavier Leroy
2002-01-16 16:46 ` Sven
2002-01-16 16:53 ` Pixel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020116113502.P68595-100000@fledge.watson.org \
--to=patrick@watson.org \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
--cc=pixel@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).