From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA26274; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:41:05 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA27520 for ; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:41:03 +0100 (MET) Received: from favie.faith.gr.jp (favie.faith.gr.jp [61.127.175.250]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g0PMf0f08548; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 23:41:01 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (dhcp7.faith.gr.jp [192.168.1.17]) by favie.faith.gr.jp (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA03843; Sat, 26 Jan 2002 07:40:57 +0900 To: alan.schmitt@inria.fr Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: [Caml-list] CDK support In-Reply-To: <20020125201853.C1425@alan-schm1p> References: <3C5107ED.4030508@free.fr> <20020125201853.C1425@alan-schm1p> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20020126074015J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2002 07:40:15 +0900 From: Jacques Garrigue X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, Talking of the CDK, wouldn't it be better to move it to a more standard framework using findlib and ocamldoc ? While I'm interested in this effort, requiring downloading and installing of the whole CDK before being able to use any of its functionality seems an hindrance, particularly when your architecture is badly supported by the CDK, and you have to patch your way out. Also, it should be easy to write makefiles that work both with and without the tools installed. Well, findlib might be a requirement, since its functionality is basic enough. A patch on the compiler is completely impractical when I have to recompile several times a week. Cheers, and hoping for an even better CDK. Jacques From: Alan Schmitt Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Compiler ActiveDVI (CVS) > > Comme il va au bout je suis content malgr=E9 quelques doutes avec = > > cdk_config et CamlTk > = > Don't worry about the cdk_config thing, I added that to the ./configur= e > as I'm a cdk addict (I guess I'm the only one too ;-) ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr