From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id SAA11560; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:07:06 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA11741 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:07:05 +0100 (MET) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g14H75109193 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:07:05 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA18090 for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:06:59 +0100 Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:06:59 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] camlp4o problem (was: otags problem) Message-ID: <20020204180659.G2338@verdot.inria.fr> References: <9BE7FA48-1771-11D6-A336-003065BDAA76@ece.ucsb.edu> <15454.38553.300800.53941@gargle.gargle.HOWL> <20020204155242.B2338@verdot.inria.fr> <20020204150839.GE14738@chopin.ai.univie.ac.at> <20020204164154.D2338@verdot.inria.fr> <3C5EAF65.88151205@univ-savoie.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3C5EAF65.88151205@univ-savoie.fr>; from raffalli@univ-savoie.fr on Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:57:25PM +0100 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 04:57:25PM +0100, Christophe Raffalli wrote: > I generally agree with that. But it there a tool to convert an OCaml > program from one syntax to another ? It depends on what the supposed *new* syntax is... It may be easy or difficult, because of the comments. > I would not mind changing the syntax of my 20000 thousand lines > program named PhoX, if there was a tool to do it cleanly (with good > indentation, even for part of the code with very long phrase hard to > indent) Oops... what do you call "good intentation"? I propose a "good indentation" with Camlp4, it is my opinion and 100% of myself agrees with me... if you see what I mean... -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr