From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA14131; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:08:16 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA15452 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:08:15 +0100 (MET) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g16K8Fn18721 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:08:15 +0100 (MET) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA15997 for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:08:14 +0100 Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:08:14 +0100 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion for Int32.rotate Message-ID: <20020206210814.A15985@verdot.inria.fr> References: <20020205000643.A31440@gogol.zorgol> <20020206190151.A9371@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020206190151.A9371@pauillac.inria.fr>; from xavier.leroy@inria.fr on Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:01:51PM +0100 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 07:01:51PM +0100, Xavier Leroy wrote: > A C-style syntax would be 12345L for int32 and 123456789LL for > int64; what about nativeint? 12345N ? Anything nicer? This is nice. No lexing problem. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr