From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA20365; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:15:24 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA21081 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:15:23 +0100 (MET) Received: from ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu (UX9.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.220.166]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g1FKFMv20778 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 21:15:22 +0100 (MET) Received: from 12-226-37-231.client.attbi.com ([12.226.37.231]) by ux9.sp.cs.cmu.edu id aa25023; 15 Feb 2002 15:15 EST Received: from ecc by stratocaster with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16bolG-0004B8-00 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:15:14 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 15:15:14 -0500 To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] caml on LinuxPPC Message-ID: <20020215201514.GB16036@cmu.edu> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20020212133805.H16174@cilantro.cs.wisc.edu> <20020215031733.GB12898@cmu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020215031733.GB12898@cmu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i From: "Eric C. Cooper" Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Allow me to retract my earlier remarks on the quality of OCaml on powerpc Linux. I can't always reproduce the problems I was seeing, so there is probably some other source of flakiness on that machine. No defamation of the fine Caml team was intended. -- Eric C. Cooper e c c @ c m u . e d u ------------------- Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr