From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA21836; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:27 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA21331 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:26 +0100 (MET) Received: from cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (cantina.students.cs.unibo.it [130.136.3.110]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g1MCtPv28544 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:25 +0100 (MET) Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org ([130.136.32.178]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by cantina.students.cs.unibo.it (8.12.0.Beta19/8.12.0.Beta19/Debian 8.12.0.Beta19) with ESMTP id g1MCtPWA027376 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=192 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:25 +0100 Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lordsoth.takhisis.org (8.12.0/8.12.0/Debian -3) with ESMTP id g1MCtOlk001530 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:24 +0100 Received: (from zack@localhost) by lordsoth.takhisis.org (8.12.0/8.12.0/Debian -3) id g1MCtOOo001528 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:24 +0100 Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2002 13:55:24 +0100 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: QT Bindings [Was: Re: [Caml-list] LablGtk] Message-ID: <20020222125524.GB1403@cs.unibo.it> Mail-Followup-To: caml-list@inria.fr References: <20020221231045.1b6a6988.nicolas.francois@free.fr> <20020222083437T.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> <20020222034141.3f712b75.nicolas.francois@free.fr> <20020222121139J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020222121139J.garrigue@kurims.kyoto-u.ac.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:11:39PM +0900, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > I know, GTK is far from ideal. But it's still the easiest thing to > interface with, after Tcl/Tk. Qt is so tightly bound to C++. I'm interested in ohter opinions about this. A while ago I've looked for OCaml QT bindings but I find nothing, so I looked at it thinking to write them but seems to me that the real work is really really huge. Anyway I haven't looked at it enough deeper to see the ocaml related problems. What are the intrinsic problems related to QT bindings coding? TIA, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners