From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA26370; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:59:55 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA24977 for ; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:59:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g278xjv21942; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:59:46 +0100 (MET) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA26417; Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:59:45 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 09:59:45 +0100 From: Xavier Leroy To: Brian Rogoff Cc: Charles Martin , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Does Marshal handle malicious data? Message-ID: <20020307095945.A14696@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <20020306115922.B4830@pauillac.inria.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from bpr@bpr.best.vwh.net on Wed, Mar 06, 2002 at 02:10:04PM +0000 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > I've thought that it may be useful to have a Sys.version or similar > to use in such authentication codes, since I do exactly what you > mention and ensuring integrity across compiler versions is an issue. > Opinions? Damien Doligez heard you :-) The working sources have Sys.ocaml_version, which is a string giving the version number and additional info. - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners