From: Nicolas George <nicolas.george@ens.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Big executables from ocamlopt; dynamic libraries again
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 11:12:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020318111218.A9401@clipper.ens.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1191-Sun17Mar2002193326-0800-tim@fungible.com>; from tim@fungible.com on Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 03:39:28AM +0000
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 897 bytes --]
L'octidi 28 ventôse, an CCX, Tim Freeman a écrit :
> I see the same sort of thing happening in /usr/lib/ocaml/stdlib.a, so
> lablgtk is not alone there. If you make an object, you load oo.o from
> stdlib.a, which defines an unrelated function that uses random
> numbers, so static linking then grabs random.o.
Something I dislike in OCaml since a lot of time is the mixing of
modules of compilation units. Why should a module be in only one file? A
solution to that could be an additionnal feature to the compiler:
ocamlc -m -o module.cmi module1.cmi module2.cmi module3.cmi
Then the module.cmi interface would hold all the values and types of
module[123].cmi, along with a special information (like the external
information): "to find the foobar value, you must look in the module2
module".
So huge modules could be split into smaller compilation --and linking--
units.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 237 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-18 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-16 16:05 Tim Freeman
2002-03-18 1:12 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-03-18 1:29 ` Tim Freeman
2002-03-18 5:20 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-03-18 10:10 ` [Caml-list] Big executables from ocamlopt; dynamic librariesagain Warp
2002-03-18 13:14 ` [Caml-list] Big executables from ocamlopt; dynamic libraries again Sven
2002-03-18 15:51 ` [Caml-list] Type-safe backward compatibility for .so's Tim Freeman
2002-03-18 18:46 ` [Caml-list] Big executables from ocamlopt; dynamic libraries again malc
2002-03-19 22:21 ` Johan Georg Granström
2002-03-20 2:46 ` Hashing research (was Re: [Caml-list] Big executables ...) Tim Freeman
2002-03-18 10:12 ` Nicolas George [this message]
2002-03-18 13:11 ` [Caml-list] Big executables from ocamlopt; dynamic libraries again Sven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020318111218.A9401@clipper.ens.fr \
--to=nicolas.george@ens.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).