From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id XAA01950; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:34 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA26272 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:33 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mailrelay2.inwind.it (mailrelay2.inwind.it [212.141.54.102]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g2VL9WD21369 for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from dalamar.takhisis.org (62.98.121.254) by mailrelay2.inwind.it (6.5.015) id 3C9BC89E0051546D for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:35 +0200 Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org (lordsoth.takhisis.org [192.168.1.119]) by dalamar.takhisis.org (8.12.0/8.12.0/Debian -3) with ESMTP id g2VL9QSZ010862 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:28 +0200 Received: from lordsoth.takhisis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lordsoth.takhisis.org (8.12.0/8.12.0/Debian -3) with ESMTP id g2VL9OmE011239 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:25 +0200 Received: (from zack@localhost) by lordsoth.takhisis.org (8.12.0/8.12.0/Debian -3) id g2VL9O6a011237 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:24 +0200 Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 23:09:24 +0200 From: Stefano Zacchiroli To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List Subject: [Caml-list] initializers and destructor Message-ID: <20020331210924.GA11224@cs.unibo.it> Mail-Followup-To: Inria Ocaml Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi all, I know and frequently use "initializer" construct in classes, but I'm not able to find something like destructor that works exectly like an initializer but that is invoked just before an object last reference is lost. Is this somewhat difficult to implement in relation with the OCaml GC or I'm simply missing something? TIA, Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli - undergraduate student of CS @ Univ. Bologna, Italy zack@cs.unibo.it | ICQ# 33538863 | http://www.cs.unibo.it/~zacchiro "I know you believe you understood what you think I said, but I am not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant!" -- G.Romney ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners