From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA19474; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 10:48:01 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA15028 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 10:48:01 +0200 (MET DST) X-SPAM-Warning: Sending machine is listed in blackholes.five-ten-sg.com Received: from lavoro.home.cs.york.ac.uk (public1-york1-5-cust17.leed.broadband.ntl.com [80.0.45.17]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g3D8lxr13233 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 10:48:00 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200204130848.g3D8lxr13233@nez-perce.inria.fr> To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: RE: [Caml-list] operator overloading Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 09:43:51 +0100 From: forsyth@caldo.demon.co.uk MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk >>compared to >>the simple mechanism for overloading operators in C++. >>It would be nice to see something more straightforward. i think it's the first time i've seen operator overloading in C++ described as a `simple mechanism'. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners