From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id LAA17494; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 11:00:51 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA08893 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 11:00:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g3D90nL07787 for ; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 11:00:49 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA25443 for caml-list@inria.fr; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 11:00:44 +0200 Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 11:00:44 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] operator overloading Message-ID: <20020413110044.H19155@verdot.inria.fr> References: <5c4c7f87050f7f07d2@[192.168.1.6]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5c4c7f87050f7f07d2@[192.168.1.6]>; from ITrotts@IdolMinds.com on Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:08:15PM -0600 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 01:08:15PM -0600, Issac Trotts wrote: > Can anyone recommend a way to work around OCaml's lack of operator > overloading when dealing with matrices, vectors, and spinors? Is > there a way to implement this with ocamlp4? Camlp4 cannot help: overloading is not just syntax. Camlp4 can sometimes extend the typing, but not in this case. -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners