From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id TAA18102; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:05:31 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA18196 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:05:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from str12.sobor.org (adsl-63-198-183-99.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.198.183.99]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g4AH5TH29212 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 19:05:30 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by str12.sobor.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60FD99860; Fri, 10 May 2002 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:56:19 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20020510.095619.07641696.avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> To: info@gerd-stolpmann.de Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Suggestion about balanced trees in stdlib From: "Alexander V.Voinov" In-Reply-To: <20020510185954.C635@ice.gerd-stolpmann.de> References: <20020510185954.C635@ice.gerd-stolpmann.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.2 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi From: Gerd Stolpmann Subject: [Caml-list] Suggestion about balanced trees in stdlib Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:59:54 +0200 > Balanced_tree would have the following operations: > > - all of Set > - all of Map > - operations on intervals: "iter_interval", "fold_interval", and "interval" > (returning the subset) Yes, this would be great, together with the rest of the proposal. Alexander ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners