From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id VAA22142; Thu, 16 May 2002 21:57:55 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id VAA22128 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 21:57:54 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from verdot.inria.fr (verdot.inria.fr [128.93.11.7]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g4GJvr118298 for ; Thu, 16 May 2002 21:57:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ddr@localhost) by verdot.inria.fr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA08232 for caml-list@inria.fr; Thu, 16 May 2002 21:57:48 +0200 Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 21:57:48 +0200 From: Daniel de Rauglaudre To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Overlapping features of variant types and tuples in Ocaml Message-ID: <20020516215748.N2924@verdot.inria.fr> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from vesa_karvonen@hotmail.com on Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:45:44PM +0300 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk Hi, On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 10:45:44PM +0300, Vesa Karvonen wrote: > I'm not quite sure what you mean. Do you mean that improving the > syntax is perceived to be waste of time by many people. Right. Notice that your question is frequently asked. Your problem could be resolved syntactically (I mean by changing the syntax). See Camlp4 and its "revised syntax", section "types". -- Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/ ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners