From: Daniel de Rauglaudre <daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4/OCaml [was: Generating C stubs]
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 09:09:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020517090955.D14342@verdot.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.40.0205170357340.11758-100000@bpr.best.vwh.net>; from bpr@bpr.best.vwh.net on Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:12:28AM +0000
Hi,
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 04:12:28AM +0000, Brian Rogoff wrote:
> I dread the prospect of a flamewar over this, but I think that removing
> CamlP4 from OCaml is a very bad idea, and a step backwards. Bad news to
> me, indeed...
Right. Divorce is generally a bad idea, but the solution when the
marriage have been done with a bad preparation and lies.
> I would encourage reconsidering this decision. Note that for any
> given feature beyond core ML (labels, variants, objects, higher
> order functors, ...) I can imagine someone considering that feature
> "not serious".
No decision is definitive, I can change my mind, but I have asked for
propositions since two months, and nothing happened. Separation is the
best compromise I found. If somebody has a better solution (except
hide the problem under the carpet), I am ready to hear it.
--
Daniel de RAUGLAUDRE
daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr
http://cristal.inria.fr/~ddr/
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-17 7:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-15 9:13 [Caml-list] Generating C stubs Jérôme Marant
2002-05-15 9:49 ` Jocelyn Sérot
2002-05-15 12:17 ` Jérôme Marant
2002-05-15 12:38 ` Remi VANICAT
2002-05-15 20:19 ` Jérôme Marant
2002-05-16 7:06 ` Florian Hars
2002-05-16 7:34 ` Markus Mottl
2002-05-16 19:13 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4/OCaml [was: Generating C stubs] Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-05-16 19:27 ` Chris Hecker
2002-05-16 19:39 ` John Prevost
2002-05-16 19:44 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-05-16 20:28 ` Chris Hecker
2002-05-16 21:38 ` Markus Mottl
2002-05-17 0:31 ` Alessandro Baretta
2002-05-17 14:32 ` Pierre Weis
2002-05-17 15:31 ` Markus Mottl
2002-05-17 21:18 ` Pierre Weis
2002-05-17 21:37 ` Dave Mason
2002-05-18 9:46 ` Pierre Weis
2002-05-21 17:51 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2002-05-19 11:31 ` Markus Mottl
2002-05-21 17:10 ` james woodyatt
2002-05-20 1:18 ` [Caml-list] Tail recursion detection John Max Skaller
2002-05-21 7:46 ` Alain Frisch
2002-05-21 11:35 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2002-05-21 15:12 ` John Max Skaller
2002-05-22 12:44 ` Noel Welsh
2002-05-22 16:47 ` John Max Skaller
2002-05-21 8:57 ` Noel Welsh
2002-05-20 22:59 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4/OCaml [was: Generating C stubs] Alessandro Baretta
2002-05-16 23:22 ` [Caml-list] Re: Camlp4/OCaml Christopher Quinn
2002-05-17 7:02 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.4.40.0205170357340.11758-100000@bpr.best.vwh.net>
2002-05-17 7:09 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre [this message]
2002-05-17 7:54 ` [Caml-list] Camlp4/OCaml Michel Mauny
2002-05-17 8:05 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2002-05-16 14:09 ` [Caml-list] Generating C stubs Benedikt Grundmann
2002-05-16 16:37 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-05-16 16:31 ` Benedikt Grundmann
2002-05-17 5:59 ` Jeff Henrikson
2002-05-16 23:22 [Caml-list] Camlp4/OCaml [was: Generating C stubs] Joshua D. Guttman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020517090955.D14342@verdot.inria.fr \
--to=daniel.de_rauglaudre@inria.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).