From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id NAA29589; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:44:44 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA29278 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:44:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from altern.org (altern.org [80.67.174.57]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id g64BihP06616 for ; Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:44:43 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200207041144.g64BihP06616@concorde.inria.fr> Received: (qmail 21277 invoked by alias); 4 Jul 2002 11:41:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 4 Jul 2002 11:41:56 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:41:56 +0200 (CEST) From: Subject: re : [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but... To: dmason@sarg.ryerson.ca, caml-list@inria.fr MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk I agree. I experienced similar problems with CDK. I just wanted the X11 code. Had lot of problems, I thought that it didn't like OpenBSD, I tried on Linux. Also, having to recompile Ocaml isn't very convenient, and it's tricky to compile CDK with an already compiled Ocaml (I didn't manage... I haven't spent a full week on it, though). So I'd really like to have a CDK that compiles easily and cleanly on a UNIX box, and that doesn't need a specific Ocaml version. I mean, patching the compiler to install a X lib doesn't sound good to me. -- Berke ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners