From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA16467; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:36:22 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA16228 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:36:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from alan-schm1p.inria.fr (alan-schm1p.inria.fr [128.93.20.79]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g658a6f11168; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:36:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by alan-schm1p.inria.fr (Postfix, from userid 501) id 17B34425D; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:35:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 10:35:30 +0200 From: Alan Schmitt To: "Alexander V. Voinov" Cc: Dave Mason , caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but... Message-ID: <20020705083530.GI5481@alan-schm1p> Mail-Followup-To: "Alexander V. Voinov" , Dave Mason , caml-list@inria.fr References: <200207040017.g640H1p30536@sarg.ryerson.ca> <20020705050555.GZ5481@alan-schm1p> <3D2530A9.F03906F6@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3D2530A9.F03906F6@quasar.ipa.nw.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Editor: Vim http://vim.sf.net/ X-Info: http://pauillac.inria.fr/~aschmitt/ X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.18-6mdk (i686) X-Uptime: 8:51am up 1 day, 8:07, 1 user, load average: 0.07, 0.15, 0.16 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk * Alexander V. Voinov (avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru) wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Alan Schmitt wrote: > > - make recompiling easy (in my dream world, when I recompile ocaml, I'd > > like to be able to recompile all the libraries and apps that depend on > > it with one command). > > Again, _why_ do you want to recompile ocaml? Both me and Dave and Berke > emphasized that a key to the adoption of this intergrated kit is that it > compiles with the stock binary version of ocaml for the respective > platform. I can't understand the reason to have a special version of > ocaml for CDK. What I meant was "when a new version of ocaml comes out, or when I want to recompile ocaml from cvs, ...". At the moment, each time I install a new version of ocaml, I need to recompile all librairies that depend on the standard library if it has changed a bit. Same thing if I get a new version of, say, lablgtk, with all my gtk apps. So I don't mean to have a special version of ocaml with any packaging system, just to be able to handle dependencies among librairies. Best, Alan -- The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners