From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA22724; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:02:52 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA22664 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:02:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g65E2of27892 for ; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:02:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from xleroy@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id QAA22510 for caml-list@inria.fr; Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:02:50 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 16:02:50 +0200 From: Xavier Leroy To: caml-list@inria.fr Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but... Message-ID: <20020705160250.B20462@pauillac.inria.fr> References: <200207040017.g640H1p30536@sarg.ryerson.ca> <20020705050555.GZ5481@alan-schm1p> <20020705090821.GA10989@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <20020705090821.GA10989@fichte.ai.univie.ac.at>; from markus@oefai.at on Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:08:21AM +0200 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk > Which indicates again, how badly we need packaging standards for OCaml... I couldn't agree more. But that's no small undertaking :-) - Xavier Leroy ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners